Methodology
How we verify peptides
Every sample is analyzed independently at UZH & ETH Zurich using RP-HPLC-MS — reversed-phase HPLC with ESI-TOF-MS detection — which simultaneously determines purity & confirms molecular identity in a single coupled run. Structural confirmation is provided by NMR spectroscopy. We have no affiliation with any peptide vendor. Our methodology is fully open.
RP-HPLC-MS: purity & identity in one run
Reversed-phase HPLC coupled to ESI-TOF-MS is the workhorse of our analysis. The instrument runs a single chromatographic separation — peptides partition by hydrophobicity across a C18 column — with two detectors in series: a UV detector at 214 nm & an ESI-TOF mass spectrometer.
The UV detector at 214 nm records the peptide bond absorption of every peak in the chromatogram. Peak areas yield the purity percentage directly: the main peak divided by the sum of all peaks. This is the industry-standard purity figure reported on every analytical report.
The ESI-TOF-MS detectorreceives the same eluent & measures the mass of ions as they exit the column. For the main chromatographic peak, this gives the observed molecular weight to within <5 ppm of the theoretical monoisotopic mass — unambiguous identity confirmation. For impurity peaks, it identifies what those impurities actually are: deletion sequences (slightly lower MW), oxidized variants (+16 Da on Met or Trp), deamidated residues (+1 Da), or truncated sequences. This is information a UV-only chromatogram cannot provide.
Our purity quantification is consistent with ICH Q2(R1) analytical validation guidelines, covering specificity, linearity, range, & precision.
NMR spectroscopy: orthogonal verification
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy provides structural information that mass spectrometry cannot. While MS confirms the molecular weight, NMR resolves the chemical environment of individual atoms, detecting structural isomers, epimers, incorrect disulfide connectivity, & non-UV-active impurities that would pass undetected in a chromatogram.
We record NMR spectra as an orthogonal check on every sample. The outcome (consistent, inconclusive, or inconsistent with the expected structure) is reported alongside the MS & LC data in the report. A result where MS confirms identity but NMR flags an inconsistency is a meaningful finding that no single-method service would catch.
Endotoxin testing: bacterial contamination (add-on)
Peptides synthesized in non-GMP environments can carry lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxins from gram-negative bacteria. Even at sub-microgram concentrations, endotoxins trigger potent immune responses: fever, inflammation, & in high doses, septic shock. Standard MS & NMR analysis cannot detect endotoxins because they are not the peptide compound itself.
We use the Limulus Amebocyte Lysate (LAL) assay, the gold standard for endotoxin detection in pharmaceutical & research contexts. Results are reported in EU/mg (endotoxin units per milligram of peptide). A result above 1 EU/mg is a meaningful contamination signal for research use; above 5 EU/mg warrants serious caution.
Heavy metals panel: elemental contamination (add-on)
Synthesis reagents, solvents, & equipment can introduce trace metal contaminants into the final peptide product. Lead, arsenic, cadmium, & mercury are particularly concerning: they accumulate in tissue, interfere with enzymatic processes, & are toxic at very low chronic exposures. A peptide that passes identity & purity checks by MS may still carry hazardous metal residues.
We analyze for the four most clinically significant heavy metals using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), which achieves detection limits in the parts-per-billion range. Results are reported per element in µg/g (ppm) against the ICH Q3D guideline thresholds for research use, giving you a clear, quantitative picture of elemental safety.
Why RP-HPLC-MS + NMR surpasses HPLC-UV alone
Most vendor peptide COAs are based on reversed-phase HPLC with UV detection only. HPLC-UV is fast & inexpensive, which is why it dominates. It is also insufficient as a standalone method.
What HPLC-UV cannot tell you. UV detection measures how much light each chromatographic peak absorbs at a fixed wavelength. It produces a purity figure — the fraction of total UV signal from the main peak — but it cannot confirm what that main peak actually is. Two peptides with the same amino acid composition but different sequences may co-elute. A D-amino acid substitution at a single residue is completely invisible. Non-UV-active impurities do not register at all. You get a number, not a confirmation.
What the MS detector adds.By coupling ESI-TOF-MS to the same HPLC run, every peak that the UV detector sees is also mass-analysed in real time. The main peak's molecular weight is confirmed to <5 ppm — ruling out mis-labelled or substituted compounds. Impurity peaks are identified by their mass rather than inferred from retention time alone. This is the critical difference between "purity by HPLC" & "purity by RP-HPLC-MS": in the latter, you know what each peak is.
What NMR adds. ESI-TOF-MS confirms the molecular weight but cannot resolve structural isomers, epimers (D vs. L amino acid configurations), incorrect disulfide connectivity, or modifications that leave mass unchanged. NMR probes the chemical environment of individual atoms & is the only routine method that catches these classes of defect. A sample that passes RP-HPLC-MS but fails NMR is a meaningful finding — precisely what a UV-only COA would miss entirely.
What we measure
| Measurement | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| Is it the right compound? | We check the molecular weight of your sample against what the peptide should weigh. If it matches, you have what it says on the label. |
| How pure is it? | We estimate what percentage of the sample is actually the peptide you ordered, versus byproducts or leftover synthesis junk. |
| Mass error (Δppm) | How close the measured weight is to the theoretical weight. Under 5 ppm is a pass; the instrument is accurate to within a few millionths of the total mass. |
| Report ID | A unique code tied to your result. By default, we share it so anyone can look up the raw data independently. |
Verdict criteria
Weight matches & purity is above 95%. NMR assessment successful. You got exactly what you paid for.
Weight matches but purity is 85–95%. NMR assessment successful. The compound is correct; some impurities present.
Signal was too weak or noisy to give a clear answer. Usually means poor solubility or a degraded sample. NMR result may be inconclusive.
The measured weight does not match. This is not the peptide it claims to be, which is expected to also be reflected in NMR spectroscopy result
No signal at all. The vial may have been empty or the sample completely insoluble.
Sample requirements
- Quantity: Minimum 2 mg lyophilized powder for full analysis across MS & NMR experiments.
- Format: Sealed vial or resealable bag inside the collection pouch we provide.
- Storage: Keep frozen until you insert the sample. Room temperature for shipping is acceptable for up to 72 h but our shipping is usually much faster.
- Anonymity: The vial is pre-labelled with your anonymous token before it reaches you. Do not add your name or any other identifier. The labs receive samples labelled with tokens only.
Process overview
- 1Register online
Fill in the submission form & pay securely via Stripe. You receive an anonymous token & we send you a collection envelope within 1-2 business days.
- 2Receive your envelope
A tamper-evident collection envelope arrives by post. Your anonymous token is printed on the label. No name, no address on the vial.
- 3Insert & post back
Place your sample vial in the envelope, seal it, & post it back to us.
- 4Handed to the lab
We collect your sample & hand it directly to the lab. Analysis takes 1-3 business days from receipt.
- 5Result published
We format the analytical result & publish it to your account. You receive an email notification & can view the full report in your dashboard, with the option to share publicly.